Speaker summary
68% 1 analyzed article/video 1,364 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ariela Zeneli results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 25% saturation with 282.041 hits . Analysis detected 2,270.537 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,364 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.3% and a BS Rank of 10% (25,534 of 28,364 speakers). This Ariela Zeneli is better (less manipulative) than 90.00% of the peer group. Ariela Zeneli
Speaker details
Total words: 1,364
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.0% percentile 9.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 27.9% 27.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 25.0% 25.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 10.7% 10.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 12.9% 12.9% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 13.8% 13.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 10.0% 10.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 13.6% 13.6% No True Scotsman Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 13.2% 13.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 27.9%, sitewide 7.5% Framing Effect: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 24.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 2.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 6.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 9.1% No True Scotsman: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 0.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 1.7% Halo Effect: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Middle Ground: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 0.1% Primacy Effect: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 0.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst