Speaker summary
⁠64%3 analyzed articles/videos81 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anti-Defamation League results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 113 hits. Analysis detected 260 faulty-reasoning hits from 81 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 57.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (7,035 of 26,841 speakers). This Anti-Defamation League is worse (more manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group.
Anti-Defamation League

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510073.8% percentile
57.5% BS Score3 analyzed videos81 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 43.4%43.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 43.4%43.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 43.4%43.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 43.4%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 43.4%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 43.4%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos