Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video18.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anne Arundel County Council member results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Begging the Question, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 72.7% saturation with 16 hits. Analysis detected 94 faulty-reasoning hits from 18.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 53.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,862 of 28,364 speakers). This Anne Arundel County Council member is worse (more manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group.
Anne Arundel County Council member
Speaker details
Total words: 18.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510072.3% percentile
53.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos18.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 72.7%72.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 54.5%54.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 54.5%54.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 54.5%54.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 45.5%45.5%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 45.5%45.5%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 45.5%45.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 54.5%54.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 72.7%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 54.5%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 54.5%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 54.5%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Speaker 54.5%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Speaker 45.5%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 45.5%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 45.5%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos