Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Benjamin Rothstein results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Begging the Question, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 204 faulty-reasoning hits from 153 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Benjamin Rothstein is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Benjamin Rothstein
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Benjamin Rothstein (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 153
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles153 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.8%11.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 15.7%15.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 13.1%13.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 20.9%20.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 7.8%7.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 6.5%6.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 5.2%5.2%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Author 6.5%6.5%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 6.5%6.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 9.2%9.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 20.9%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Author 15.7%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Author 15.7%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 13.1%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.2%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Author 7.8%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Author 6.5%, sitewide 5.2%Loss Aversion: Author 6.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 6.5%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.2%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos