Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video69.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anna Roca results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 104 hits. Analysis detected 422 faulty-reasoning hits from 69.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (7,734 of 26,134 speakers). This Anna Roca is worse (more manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group.
Anna Roca
Speaker details
Total words: 69.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

70% percentile
025507510070.4% percentile
50.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos69.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 61.5%61.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 61.5%61.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 69.2%69.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 61.5%61.5%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 30.8%30.8%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 30.8%30.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 19.2%19.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 19.2%19.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 69.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 61.5%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 61.5%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 61.5%, sitewide 3.7%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 30.8%, sitewide 0.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 30.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos