Speaker summary
⁠52%2 analyzed articles/videos108 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Angel Kelley results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 56.2% saturation with 86 hits. Analysis detected 378 faulty-reasoning hits from 108 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 30.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (14,553 of 28,364 speakers). This Angel Kelley is better (less manipulative) than 51.30% of the peer group.
Angel Kelley
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 108
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

49% percentile
025507510048.7% percentile
30.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos108 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 41.2%41.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 54.3%54.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 56.2%56.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 28.1%28.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 28.1%28.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 13.1%13.1%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 13.1%13.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 13.1%13.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 56.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 54.3%, sitewide 15.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 41.2%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 28.1%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 28.1%, sitewide 1.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos