Speaker summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video275 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ane Alencar results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope, Loss Aversion, and Actor-Observer Bias, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 41.5% saturation with 114.095 hits. Analysis detected 476.269 faulty-reasoning hits from 275 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (21,127 of 28,364 speakers). This Ane Alencar is better (less manipulative) than 74.50% of the peer group.
Ane Alencar
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 275
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

26% percentile
025507510025.5% percentile
16.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos275 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 41.5%41.5%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 28.3%28.3%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 18.1%18.1%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 14.7%14.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.8%7.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 6.8%6.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 7.6%7.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 17.6%17.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 41.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 15.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 0.6%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos