Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video125 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andy O’Brien results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Halo Effect, and Genetic Fallacy, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 51.2% saturation with 64 hits. Analysis detected 263 faulty-reasoning hits from 125 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 35.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (13,087 of 28,214 speakers). This Andy O’Brien is worse (more manipulative) than 53.60% of the peer group.
Andy O’Brien
Speaker details
Total words: 125
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510053.6% percentile
35.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos125 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 51.2%51.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 42.4%42.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 40.0%40.0%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 30.4%30.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 23.2%23.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 23.2%23.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 51.2%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 42.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 40.0%, sitewide 6.7%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 30.4%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Speaker 23.2%, sitewide 6.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 23.2%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos