Speaker summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video153 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andy Cunningham results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Unattributed Quote, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 47.1% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 308 faulty-reasoning hits from 153 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 20.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (19,097 of 28,364 speakers). This Andy Cunningham is better (less manipulative) than 67.30% of the peer group.
Andy Cunningham
Speaker details
Total words: 153
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

33% percentile
025507510032.7% percentile
20.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos153 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 47.1%47.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 20.6%20.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 29.4%29.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 18.6%18.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 15.2%15.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 47.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 29.4%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos