Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video66.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andy Barr results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 77% saturation with 77 hits. Analysis detected 286.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 66.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 44.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (10,913 of 28,364 speakers). This Andy Barr is worse (more manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group.
Andy Barr
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 66.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

62% percentile
025507510061.5% percentile
44.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos66.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 77.0%77.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 77.0%77.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 34.5%34.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 34.5%34.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 40.5%40.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 27.0%27.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 23.0%23.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 77.0%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 77.0%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 40.5%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 34.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 34.5%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 27.0%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 23.0%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos