Speaker summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video45 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andria Vidler results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 33.75 hits. Analysis detected 213.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 45 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 53.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,847 of 28,364 speakers). This Andria Vidler is worse (more manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group.
Andria Vidler
Speaker details
Total words: 45
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510072.3% percentile
53.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos45 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Optimism Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos