Speaker summary
74% 2 analyzed articles/videos 334.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Weissmann results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Slippery Slope , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 32.6% saturation with 125.47 hits . Analysis detected 1,181.884 faulty-reasoning hits from 334.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.8% and a BS Rank of 11% (25,238 of 28,364 speakers). This Andrew Weissmann is better (less manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group. Andrew Weissmann
Speaker details
Total words: 334.667
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.0% percentile 9.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos334.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 23.9% 23.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 32.6% 32.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 11.7% 11.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 14.5% 14.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 13.9% 13.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 27.3% 27.3% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 9.6% 9.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 8.1% 8.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 14.2% 14.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 32.6%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 27.3%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 26.9% Slippery Slope: Speaker 23.9%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 1.5% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 8.1% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 4.0% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Straw Man: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 2.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Burden of Proof: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 2.5% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 0.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst