Speaker summary
⁠64%1 analyzed article/video70 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Trites results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 35 hits. Analysis detected 70 faulty-reasoning hits from 70 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (8,377 of 28,364 speakers). This Andrew Trites is worse (more manipulative) than 70.50% of the peer group.
Andrew Trites
Speaker details
Total words: 70
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

71% percentile
025507510070.5% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos70 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos