Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video50.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Ryan results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 228 faulty-reasoning hits from 50.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 58.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (7,217 of 28,364 speakers). This Andrew Ryan is worse (more manipulative) than 74.60% of the peer group.
Andrew Ryan
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 50.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510074.6% percentile
58.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos50.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos