Speaker summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video97 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Malone results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 63% saturation with 75 hits. Analysis detected 194.547 faulty-reasoning hits from 97 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (8,190 of 28,364 speakers). This Andrew Malone is worse (more manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group.
Andrew Malone
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠72%Andrew Malone (selected)51%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 97
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

71% percentile
025507510071.1% percentile
50.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos97 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 63.0%63.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 65.5%65.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 32.0%32.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 42.7%42.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 65.5%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 63.0%, sitewide 4.6%Negativity Bias: Speaker 42.7%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 32.0%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos