Speaker summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video169 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andreas Preuninger results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Bandwagon, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 40.4% saturation with 90 hits. Analysis detected 617.011 faulty-reasoning hits from 169 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 20.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (19,030 of 28,364 speakers). This Andreas Preuninger is better (less manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group.
Andreas Preuninger
Speaker details
Total words: 169
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

33% percentile
025507510032.9% percentile
20.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos169 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 40.4%40.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 36.8%36.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 27.4%27.4%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 24.6%24.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 6.7%6.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 28.9%28.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 22.0%22.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 18.4%18.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 24.1%24.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 30.9%30.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 40.4%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 36.8%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 30.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 28.9%, sitewide 9.1%Bandwagon: Speaker 27.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 24.6%, sitewide 0.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 22.0%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 1.9%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos