Speaker summary
⁠70%2 analyzed articles/videos104 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrea Sears results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Biased Writer Voice, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 62.5% saturation with 73.125 hits. Analysis detected 229.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 104 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 37.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (11,526 of 25,765 speakers). This Andrea Sears is worse (more manipulative) than 55.30% of the peer group.
Andrea Sears
Speaker details
Total words: 104
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

55% percentile
025507510055.3% percentile
37.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos104 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 62.5%62.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 25.0%25.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Halo Effect: Speaker 62.5%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 6.0%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos