Speaker summary
⁠100%2 analyzed articles/videos69 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anadolu results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Recency Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 86.6% saturation with 59.777 hits. Analysis detected 187.777 faulty-reasoning hits from 69 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 42.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (11,283 of 28,364 speakers). This Anadolu is worse (more manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group.
Anadolu
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 69
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510060.2% percentile
42.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos69 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 86.6%86.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 36.6%36.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 36.6%36.6%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 26.7%26.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 26.7%26.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 86.6%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 36.6%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Speaker 36.6%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 6.9%Red Herring: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos