Speaker summary
⁠100%1 analyzed article/video37.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ana Devereaux results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 28.125 hits. Analysis detected 203.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 37.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 59.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (7,131 of 28,364 speakers). This Ana Devereaux is worse (more manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group.
Ana Devereaux
Speaker details
Total words: 37.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510074.9% percentile
59.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos37.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Begging the Question: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 26.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Loss Aversion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos