Speaker summary
⁠59%1 analyzed article/video175 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amos Barshad results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 27.2% saturation with 82 hits. Analysis detected 791.488 faulty-reasoning hits from 175 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (20,429 of 28,364 speakers). This Amos Barshad is better (less manipulative) than 72.00% of the peer group.
Amos Barshad
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 175
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

28% percentile
025507510028.0% percentile
17.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos175 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 43.4%43.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 21.9%21.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 21.9%21.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 21.9%21.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 38.9%38.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 27.2%27.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 23.8%23.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 26.6%26.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 43.4%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 38.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 27.2%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 26.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 8.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 0.4%Slippery Slope: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos