Speaker summary
⁠48%1 analyzed article/video47 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amjad Taha results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 41.5% saturation with 27 hits. Analysis detected 54.472 faulty-reasoning hits from 47 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 30.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (14,761 of 28,364 speakers). This Amjad Taha is better (less manipulative) than 52.00% of the peer group.
Amjad Taha
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 47
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

48% percentile
025507510048.0% percentile
30.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos47 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 41.5%41.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 33.9%33.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 15.4%15.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 41.5%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 33.9%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos

So much for Art of the Iran Deal⁠59%
Daily Kos⁠84%By kos⁠74%7/10/2026, 4:01:00 PM