Speaker summary
57%7 analyzed articles/videos327.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amir Saeid Iravani results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Quote-first Misdirection, and Negativity Bias, with Tu Quoque as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 68.459 hits. Analysis detected 416.261 faulty-reasoning hits from 327.333 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (23,394 of 28,364 speakers). This Amir Saeid Iravani is better (less manipulative) than 82.50% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

18% percentile
025507510017.5% percentile
12.8% BS Score7 analyzed videos327.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 24.9%24.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.6%4.6%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Speaker 20.1%20.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 17.7%17.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 10.8%10.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 9.3%9.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 10.4%10.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 15.1%15.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 24.9%, sitewide 1.5%Tu Quoque: Speaker 20.1%, sitewide 0.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 17.7%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate