Speaker summary
⁠64%1 analyzed article/video90.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amer al-Fayez results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Status Quo Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 60.5% saturation with 59.316 hits. Analysis detected 211.316 faulty-reasoning hits from 90.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 32.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (14,150 of 28,364 speakers). This Amer al-Fayez is worse (more manipulative) than 50.10% of the peer group.
Amer al-Fayez
Speaker details
Total words: 90.667
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510050.1% percentile
32.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos90.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 60.5%60.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 28.9%28.9%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 28.9%28.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 21.1%21.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 21.1%21.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%In-Group Bias: Speaker 60.5%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 28.9%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 28.9%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos