Speaker summary
70% 1 analyzed article/video 190 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amelia Fernandez results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 59 hits . Analysis detected 380.261 faulty-reasoning hits from 190 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.7% and a BS Rank of 16% (24,072 of 28,364 speakers). This Amelia Fernandez is better (less manipulative) than 84.90% of the peer group. Amelia Fernandez
Speaker details
Total words: 190
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.1% percentile 11.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos190 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 28.9% 28.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 21.7% 21.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 14.3% 14.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 12.3% 12.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 10.3% 10.3% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 10.3% 10.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% In-Group Bias: Speaker 28.9%, sitewide 6.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 21.7%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 15.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 8.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 3.1% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst