Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Monica Carrillo-Casas results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and False Dilemma, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 133 hits. Analysis detected 229 faulty-reasoning hits from 692 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,364 authors). This Monica Carrillo-Casas is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Monica Carrillo-Casas
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Monica Carrillo-Casas (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 692
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles692 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 19.2%19.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 4.0%4.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 2.8%2.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%In-Group Bias: Author 19.2%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos