Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Monica Carrillo-Casas results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and False Dilemma, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 133 hits. Analysis detected 229 faulty-reasoning hits from 692 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,364 authors). This Monica Carrillo-Casas is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Monica Carrillo-Casas
Author details
Ranking context
Position among analyzed authors
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles692 analyzed words
Reasoning profile
Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
Sitewide departure map
Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often