Speaker summary
⁠64%1 analyzed article/video46 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ambrogio Spinola results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 23 hits. Analysis detected 69 faulty-reasoning hits from 46 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (8,339 of 28,364 speakers). This Ambrogio Spinola is worse (more manipulative) than 70.60% of the peer group.
Ambrogio Spinola
Speaker details
Total words: 46
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

71% percentile
025507510070.6% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos46 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos