Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,128 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Logan McMillen results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 1,493 hits . Analysis detected 11,824 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,512 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 74% (1,745 of 6,499 authors). This Logan McMillen is worse (more manipulative) than 73.20% of the peer group. Logan McMillen
Author details
Total words: 8,512
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.2% percentile 3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.6% 4.6% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 17.5% 17.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 15.3% 15.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.6% 13.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 8.3% 8.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.6%, sitewide 19.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 17.5%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 15.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.0%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.3%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst