Speaker summary
⁠35%1 analyzed article/video412.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amber Heard results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Representativeness Heuristic, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 65.999 hits. Analysis detected 534.555 faulty-reasoning hits from 412.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (27,835 of 28,364 speakers). This Amber Heard is better (less manipulative) than 98.10% of the peer group.
Amber Heard
Speaker details
Total words: 412.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

2% percentile
02550751001.9% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos412.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 5.8%5.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 13.9%13.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 4.9%4.9%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 6.6%6.6%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 4.7%4.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 2.4%2.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 7.9%7.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 0.0%Special Pleading: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos