Speaker summary
⁠53%1 analyzed article/video1,743.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanda Litman results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hindsight Bias, and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 195.006 hits. Analysis detected 2,126.583 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,743.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (25,740 of 25,862 speakers). This Amanda Litman is better (less manipulative) than 99.50% of the peer group.
Amanda Litman
Speaker details
Total words: 1,743.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

1% percentile
02550751000.5% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 1.6%1.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 8.4%8.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 1.7%1.7%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 2.5%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos