Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video55 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amalia Trigo results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Anecdotal, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 67 hits. Analysis detected 232 faulty-reasoning hits from 55 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 74.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (5,644 of 28,364 speakers). This Amalia Trigo is worse (more manipulative) than 80.10% of the peer group.
Amalia Trigo
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 55
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

80% percentile
025507510080.1% percentile
74.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos55 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 73.1%73.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 73.1%73.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 26.9%26.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 73.1%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 73.1%, sitewide 3.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 26.9%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos