Speaker summary
⁠43%3 analyzed articles/videos96.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alvin Bragg results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 46.5% saturation with 54.143 hits. Analysis detected 184.143 faulty-reasoning hits from 96.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 22.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (18,221 of 28,364 speakers). This Alvin Bragg is better (less manipulative) than 64.20% of the peer group.
Alvin Bragg
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 96.333
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

36% percentile
025507510035.8% percentile
22.1% BS Score3 analyzed videos96.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 46.5%46.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 17.2%17.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 17.2%17.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 17.2%17.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 17.2%17.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 17.2%17.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 46.5%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 9.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos