Speaker summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video123.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Allison Hile results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Indoctrination, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 39.5% saturation with 53.542 hits. Analysis detected 224.955 faulty-reasoning hits from 123.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (21,235 of 28,364 speakers). This Allison Hile is better (less manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group.
Allison Hile
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 123.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

25% percentile
025507510025.1% percentile
16.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos123.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 39.5%39.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 14.5%14.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 14.0%14.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 14.5%14.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 18.0%18.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 14.5%14.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 8.0%8.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 39.5%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 3.3%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos