Speaker summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video122 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Allan Carver results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope, False Dilemma, and Straw Man, with Fundamental Attribution Error as the most egregious example at 30.4% saturation with 62 hits. Analysis detected 253.802 faulty-reasoning hits from 122 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (14,949 of 26,155 speakers). This Allan Carver is better (less manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group.
Allan Carver
Speaker details
Total words: 122
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

43% percentile
025507510042.8% percentile
27.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos122 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 57.5%57.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 42.5%42.5%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 30.4%30.4%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 30.4%30.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 26.9%26.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 8.3%8.3%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Straw Man: Speaker 57.5%, sitewide 0.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 42.5%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 30.4%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Speaker 30.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 26.9%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 3.3%Straw ManSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos