Speaker summary
⁠46%1 analyzed article/video9 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alissa Michel results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias and Unattributed Quote, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 9 hits. Analysis detected 27 faulty-reasoning hits from 9 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (142 of 26,828 speakers). This Alissa Michel is worse (more manipulative) than 99.50% of the peer group.
Alissa Michel
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 9
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

100% percentile
025507510099.5% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos9 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos