Speaker summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video115 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alison Hawkins results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 58.8% saturation with 67.61 hits. Analysis detected 286.61 faulty-reasoning hits from 115 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 29.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (14,853 of 28,186 speakers). This Alison Hawkins is better (less manipulative) than 52.70% of the peer group.
Alison Hawkins
Speaker details
Total words: 115
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

47% percentile
025507510047.3% percentile
29.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos115 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 58.8%58.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 26.4%26.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 35.2%35.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 23.6%23.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 17.6%17.6%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 17.6%17.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 58.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 35.2%, sitewide 15.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 26.4%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Speaker 23.6%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos