Speaker summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video114 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alice Zurlo results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Authority, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 30.3% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 122 faulty-reasoning hits from 114 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 20.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (18,283 of 26,805 speakers). This Alice Zurlo is better (less manipulative) than 68.20% of the peer group.
Alice Zurlo
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 114
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

32% percentile
025507510031.8% percentile
20.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos114 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 30.3%30.3%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 19.1%19.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 15.8%15.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 15.1%15.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 30.3%, sitewide 4.6%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos