Speaker summary
⁠51%1 analyzed article/video98 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alice Weidel results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Framing Effect, and Anchoring Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 32.3% saturation with 53 hits. Analysis detected 127.208 faulty-reasoning hits from 98 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (22,781 of 28,364 speakers). This Alice Weidel is better (less manipulative) than 80.30% of the peer group.
Alice Weidel
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 98
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

20% percentile
025507510019.7% percentile
13.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos98 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 32.3%32.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 14.0%14.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 2.4%2.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 4.9%4.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 8.6%8.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 32.3%, sitewide 3.3%Framing Effect: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 26.9%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos