Speaker summary
57% 1 analyzed article/video 2,280.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alexander Heffner results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Appeal to Emotion , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 475.512 hits . Analysis detected 4,058.299 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,280.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 2% (28,048 of 28,364 speakers). This Alexander Heffner is better (less manipulative) than 98.90% of the peer group. Alexander Heffner
Speaker details
Total words: 2,280.667
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.1% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 18.6% 18.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 6.2% 6.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 8.2% 8.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 4.6% 4.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 0.8% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 3.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Straw Man: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.9% Primacy Effect: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst