Speaker summary
⁠31%1 analyzed article/video123.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alex Susskind results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Confirmation Bias, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 312 faulty-reasoning hits from 123.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (19,521 of 28,364 speakers). This Alex Susskind is better (less manipulative) than 68.80% of the peer group.
Alex Susskind
Speaker details
Total words: 123.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

31% percentile
025507510031.2% percentile
19.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos123.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 22.5%22.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 22.5%22.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 22.5%22.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 22.5%22.5%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 14.5%14.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 14.5%14.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 22.5%22.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 14.5%14.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos