Speaker summary
⁠100%1 analyzed article/video65.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alex Rikleen results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Slippery Slope as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 98 hits. Analysis detected 673.069 faulty-reasoning hits from 65.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (5,289 of 28,364 speakers). This Alex Rikleen is worse (more manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group.
Alex Rikleen
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠82%Alex Rikleen (selected)76%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 65.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

81% percentile
025507510081.4% percentile
75.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos65.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 83.3%83.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 75.0%75.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Slippery Slope: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.7%Horn Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 83.3%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos