Speaker summary
⁠68%1 analyzed article/video132 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Albert Chow results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Framing Effect, and Loss Aversion, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50.5% saturation with 75 hits. Analysis detected 274.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 132 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (12,676 of 28,364 speakers). This Albert Chow is worse (more manipulative) than 55.30% of the peer group.
Albert Chow
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 132
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

55% percentile
025507510055.3% percentile
37.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos132 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 50.5%50.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.5%50.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 25.3%25.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 25.3%25.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.5%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 50.5%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 4.6%Framing Effect: Speaker 25.3%, sitewide 26.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 25.3%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos