Speaker summary
⁠50%2 analyzed articles/videos81.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alaric Keams results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Confirmation Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 66.7% saturation with 70 hits. Analysis detected 210 faulty-reasoning hits from 81.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 54.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,649 of 27,830 speakers). This Alaric Keams is worse (more manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group.
Alaric Keams
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 81.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510072.5% percentile
54.2% BS Score2 analyzed videos81.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 66.7%66.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 66.7%66.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 33.3%33.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 66.7%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 66.7%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 9.1%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos