Speaker summary
⁠53%2 analyzed articles/videos117.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alamo Drafthouse results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Overconfidence Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 54.4% saturation with 80 hits. Analysis detected 161 faulty-reasoning hits from 117.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 21.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (18,328 of 28,364 speakers). This Alamo Drafthouse is better (less manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group.
Alamo Drafthouse
Speaker details
Total words: 117.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

35% percentile
025507510035.4% percentile
21.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos117.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 54.4%54.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 15.0%15.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 11.6%11.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 54.4%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 6.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos