Speaker summary
35%6 analyzed articles/videos504.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Al Schmidt results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including No True Scotsman, Self-Serving Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 27.4% saturation with 186 hits. Analysis detected 555 faulty-reasoning hits from 504.5 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.2% and a BS Rank of 12% (24,430 of 27,710 speakers). This Al Schmidt is better (less manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group.
Al Schmidt
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

12% percentile
025507510011.8% percentile
10.2% BS Score6 analyzed videos504.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Speaker 16.5%16.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 27.4%27.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 2.4%2.4%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 8.1%8.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 10.9%10.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 27.4%, sitewide 11.1%No True Scotsman: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 0.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate