Speaker summary
⁠50%1 analyzed article/video293.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Al Littlepage results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 90 hits. Analysis detected 481.062 faulty-reasoning hits from 293.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (39,486 of 42,608 speakers). This Al Littlepage is better (less manipulative) than 92.70% of the peer group.
Al Littlepage
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠8%Al Littlepage (selected)8%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 293.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

7% percentile
02550751007.3% percentile
7.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos293.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 18.5%18.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 17.7%17.7%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 7.6%7.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 11.3%11.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 4.1%4.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Speaker 17.7%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 4.0%No True Scotsman: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Composition/Division: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 0.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos