Publication summary
47% 20 analyzed articles/videos 12,633 analyzed words
BS Summary: These phillytrib.com results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.8% saturation with 3,029 hits . Analysis detected 38,526 faulty-reasoning hits from 63,642 analyzed words across 20 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 41% (338 of 565 publications). This phillytrib.com is better (less manipulative) than 59.80% of the peer group. phillytrib.com
Publication details
Total words: 63,642
Article count: 20
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.2% percentile 1.3% BS Score20 analyzed articles63.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.7% 2.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst