Author summary
48% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,246 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marco Cerino results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 932 hits . Analysis detected 5,827 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,984 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 51% (4,509 of 9,052 authors). This Marco Cerino is worse (more manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group. Marco Cerino
Author details
Total words: 8,984
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.2% percentile 2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 10.4% 10.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Author 10.4%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst