Author summary
55% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,312 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kylan Watson results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Halo Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 573 hits . Analysis detected 3,593 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,524 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 39% (5,493 of 8,932 authors). This Kylan Watson is better (less manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group. Kylan Watson
Author details
Total words: 6,524
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.5% percentile 1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.7% 3.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.5% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst