Speaker summary
⁠100%1 analyzed article/video37 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Al-Houthi results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, In-Group Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 185 faulty-reasoning hits from 37 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (187 of 36,025 speakers). This Al-Houthi is worse (more manipulative) than 99.50% of the peer group.
Al-Houthi
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠100%Al-Houthi (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 37
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

100% percentile
025507510099.5% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos37 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos