Speaker summary
84%1 analyzed article/video163.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai-jen Poo results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 71.1% saturation with 116.25 hits. Analysis detected 528 faulty-reasoning hits from 163.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.8% and a BS Rank of 45% (14,933 of 26,828 speakers). This Ai-jen Poo is better (less manipulative) than 55.70% of the peer group.
Ai-jen Poo
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 163.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

44% percentile
025507510044.3% percentile
27.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos163.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 65.1%65.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 71.1%71.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 27.1%27.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 24.8%24.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 22.9%22.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 17.4%17.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 16.5%16.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 27.1%27.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 9.6%9.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 17.4%17.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 71.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 65.1%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 27.1%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 27.1%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 24.8%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 22.9%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos